<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--
  Machine-readable licensing terms for anojh.com, in the RSL 1.0 vocabulary
  (https://rslstandard.org/rsl). Crawlers find this three ways: the `License:`
  directive in /robots.txt, the <link rel="license" type="application/rsl+xml">
  element on each post, and the `usageInfo` property in each post's JSON-LD.

  `payment type="attribution"` is RSL's way of saying the price of use is a
  visible credit and a working link back to the source. The <standard> element
  names CC BY 4.0 as the legal instrument behind that requirement, so a
  licensee who honours the Creative Commons terms has satisfied this file.

  <prohibits> carves model training back out. RSL 1.0 is explicit that where
  <permits> and <prohibits> name the same usage the prohibition wins, so
  "all except ai-train" is the intended way to write this. Note the tension it
  creates with the CC BY grant above, which on its face permits any use: this
  is an express reservation of rights (EU 2019/790 Art. 4) layered on a
  permissive licence, not a bespoke licence. Moving <standard> to CC BY-NC 4.0
  would close the gap for commercial trainers, at the cost of also barring
  commercial reuse by people.

  Scope is deliberately /blog/ only. The rest of anojh.com — bio, portfolio,
  ventures — is not licensed here and remains all rights reserved.

  <schema> must resolve to a schema.org CreativeWork; /blog emits Blog JSON-LD
  for exactly that reason. If that markup is ever removed, drop this element.
-->
<rsl xmlns="https://rslstandard.org/rsl">
  <content url="/blog/">
    <schema>https://anojh.com/blog</schema>
    <license>
      <permits type="usage">all</permits>
      <prohibits type="usage">ai-train</prohibits>
      <payment type="attribution">
        <standard>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</standard>
      </payment>
    </license>
  </content>
</rsl>
